Home  /  Corridors  /  Corridor Detail  /  LEO → Lunar Surface

LEO → Lunar Surface

Corridor detail · status Q4 2026

5.90 km/s from low Earth orbit to the lunar surface, flown 28 times since Luna 9 in 1966, six of them by Apollo crews. It is the only corridor in the index that crew have flown end to end.

Δv
5.90 km/s
Transit
3-5 d
Gear ratio
30.7×
Window
Daily
Landings
28
Status
Flown

Corridor record

The Fields Every Corridor Carries

The same fields open every corridor detail page.

From
LEO
To
Lunar surface
Δv
5.90 km/s
Transit
3-5 days direct; 3-4 months by ballistic lunar transfer
Gear ratio
30.7× on LOX/methane, from Earth's surface
Window
Daily departures; lighting limits south-pole arrivals within each month
Light time
1.3 s one way
Carries
Crew, landers, and anything not made locally
Status
Flown
Retired
No
Rated
Observed

Δv budget

5.9 km/s in Three Burns

Through a 100 km lunar parking orbit, as Apollo and Chang'e-5 flew it.

Δv by leg
LegΔvFlown byRated
LEO → trans-lunar injection3.15 km/sApollo S-IVB stage; Long March 5 upper stage on Chang'e-5Observed
Lunar orbit insertion, 100 km0.85 km/sApollo service module; Chang'e-5 orbiterObserved
Descent and landing1.90 km/sApollo lunar module descent stage; Chang'e 7,500 N variable-thrust engineObserved
Total5.90 km/sDirect descent without a parking orbit costs about the sameObserved

Artemis stages through a near-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO): cheaper to reach from Earth, about 2.5-2.7 km/s from NRHO down to the surface. Depots and staging orbits are on Cislunar Space.

Who has flown it

28 Landings by Six Operators Since 1966

The firsts, then the totals by program. Landing sites and what each mission found are on The Moon.

Firsts on the LEO → Lunar surface corridor
MissionOperatorYearFirstRated
Luna 9USSR1966First soft landingObserved
Apollo 11NASA1969First crew; six crewed landings through Apollo 17, 1972Observed
Luna 16USSR1970First robotic sample returnObserved
Chang'e-3CNSA2013First landing since Luna 24 in 1976Observed
Chang'e-4CNSA2019First far-side landingObserved
Chandrayaan-3ISRO2023First landing near the south poleObserved
IM-1 OdysseusIntuitive Machines2024First commercial landing; tipped on touchdownObserved
Chang'e-6CNSA2024First far-side sample returnObserved
Successful landings by program
ProgramLandingsYearsNotesRated
USSR, Luna program81966-1976Three sample returns; Lunokhod 1 and 2 roversObserved
NASA, Surveyor and Apollo111966-1972Five Surveyors; six Apollo crewsObserved
CNSA, Chang'e42013-2024Two rovers; two sample returnsObserved
ISRO, Chandrayaan12023Chandrayaan-2 lander lost in 2019Observed
JAXA, SLIM12024Landed on its nose; still operatedObserved
Commercial, CLPS32024-2025IM-1, IM-2 and Blue Ghost Mission 1; both IM landers tippedObserved

Failed attempts left out of the totals: Beresheet (SpaceIL, 2019), Hakuto-R Mission 1 (ispace, 2023), Luna 25 (Roscosmos, 2023) and Resilience (ispace, 2025).

Who flies it next

Six Landers in Development, Two Crew Programs

The US Artemis landers and China's crewed program both use this corridor.

Vehicles in development
VehicleOperatorRoleRated
Starship HLSSpaceXCrew lander for Artemis III; refilled in LEOBuilding
Blue Moon MK1Blue OriginCargo landerBuilding
Blue Moon MK2Blue OriginCrew lander for Artemis VBuilding
Lanyue and Mengzhou on Long March 10CMSACrewed landing before 2030Building
Chang'e-7CNSASouth-pole ice survey; launch postponed 24 August 2026Building
Chang'e-8CNSAResource-use demonstration ahead of ILRSBuilding

Program detail is on Artemis and Chinese Program Structure.

Gear ratio

Every Ton on the Surface Costs About 30.7 Tons Launched

Rocket equation for the full 5.90 km/s from LEO, dry mass fraction 0.10, times the 5.2× Earth-to-LEO launch factor.

Gear ratio by propulsion class
PropulsionIspMass ratioGear ratioRated
Storable, MMH/NTO320 s6.5537.9×Observed
Methane, LOX/CH4360 s5.3230.7×Observed
Hydrogen, LOX/LH2450 s3.8122.0×Observed
Nuclear thermal to lunar orbit, hydrogen to land900 s, 450 s2.4214.0×Modeled

Landing needs high thrust, so nuclear electric propulsion can carry only the in-space legs. Water, oxygen and structure made on the Moon each replace that many tons of launch; whether making them beats shipping is the Ship-or-Make Threshold. The mass driver that sends material the other way is on The Moon.

Time and windows

Three Days, Any Day

The Moon is the only surface destination with a continuous launch window.

Apollo crews took about three days each way. Cargo can trade time for propellant on a ballistic lunar transfer: Korea's Danuri and NASA's CAPSTONE both took about four months in 2022 and saved on lunar orbit insertion.

Light time is 1.3 seconds each way, so surface machines can be teleoperated with lag - see Launch Windows & Cadence for the destinations where that stops being true.

China

Half the Landings Since 1976 Are Chinese

Four Chang'e landers, two relays and a crewed lander in development.

Chinese programs on this corridor
ProgramData pointRated
Chang'e-3 to Chang'e-6 · CNSAFour landings, 2013-2024, on Long March 3B and Long March 5Observed
Queqiao-1 and Queqiao-2 · CNSARelays at EML-2 and in lunar frozen orbit; make far-side landings possibleObserved
Lanyue lander · CMSACrewed lander; Lanyue and Mengzhou launch separately on Long March 10 and dock in lunar orbitBuilding
ILRS · CNSA and RoscosmosSouth-pole base; nuclear power station delivery 2035Projected

Contested

Deliberately Not Claimed

The load-bearing uncertainties, tagged with the confidence they actually earn.

Modeled

The gear ratio ignores refilling. Starship HLS reaches the Moon after several tanker flights refill it in LEO. Refilling changes how many launches the corridor takes, not the mass ratio of the route.

Modeled

One Δv for every landing site. Polar and equatorial sites cost nearly the same from LEO, but south-pole landings face long shadows and narrow lighting windows that the Δv does not show.

Record

Provenance and Data Sources

Confidence
Observed for flown, fielded or measured - Building for hardware and programs in development - Projected for announced plans - Modeled for original analysis
Status date
Q4 2026
Mission data
Apollo mission reports; Luna and Surveyor programs; CNSA Chang'e-3 to Chang'e-6; ISRO Chandrayaan-3; JAXA SLIM; Intuitive Machines IM-1 and IM-2; Firefly Blue Ghost Mission 1; KARI Danuri; NASA CAPSTONE
China
CNSA Chang'e and Queqiao; CMSA Mengzhou, Lanyue and Long March 10; Chang'e-7 postponement (24 August 2026)
Weakest link
Artemis lander schedules