Corridor record
The Fields Every Corridor Carries
The same fields open every corridor detail page.
- From
- LEO
- To
- Lunar surface
- Δv
- 5.90 km/s
- Transit
- 3-5 days direct; 3-4 months by ballistic lunar transfer
- Gear ratio
- 30.7× on LOX/methane, from Earth's surface
- Window
- Daily departures; lighting limits south-pole arrivals within each month
- Light time
- 1.3 s one way
- Carries
- Crew, landers, and anything not made locally
- Status
- Flown
- Retired
- No
- Rated
- Observed
Δv budget
5.9 km/s in Three Burns
Through a 100 km lunar parking orbit, as Apollo and Chang'e-5 flew it.
| Leg | Δv | Flown by | Rated |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEO → trans-lunar injection | 3.15 km/s | Apollo S-IVB stage; Long March 5 upper stage on Chang'e-5 | Observed |
| Lunar orbit insertion, 100 km | 0.85 km/s | Apollo service module; Chang'e-5 orbiter | Observed |
| Descent and landing | 1.90 km/s | Apollo lunar module descent stage; Chang'e 7,500 N variable-thrust engine | Observed |
| Total | 5.90 km/s | Direct descent without a parking orbit costs about the same | Observed |
Artemis stages through a near-rectilinear halo orbit (NRHO): cheaper to reach from Earth, about 2.5-2.7 km/s from NRHO down to the surface. Depots and staging orbits are on Cislunar Space.
Who has flown it
28 Landings by Six Operators Since 1966
The firsts, then the totals by program. Landing sites and what each mission found are on The Moon.
| Mission | Operator | Year | First | Rated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luna 9 | USSR | 1966 | First soft landing | Observed |
| Apollo 11 | NASA | 1969 | First crew; six crewed landings through Apollo 17, 1972 | Observed |
| Luna 16 | USSR | 1970 | First robotic sample return | Observed |
| Chang'e-3 | CNSA | 2013 | First landing since Luna 24 in 1976 | Observed |
| Chang'e-4 | CNSA | 2019 | First far-side landing | Observed |
| Chandrayaan-3 | ISRO | 2023 | First landing near the south pole | Observed |
| IM-1 Odysseus | Intuitive Machines | 2024 | First commercial landing; tipped on touchdown | Observed |
| Chang'e-6 | CNSA | 2024 | First far-side sample return | Observed |
| Program | Landings | Years | Notes | Rated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USSR, Luna program | 8 | 1966-1976 | Three sample returns; Lunokhod 1 and 2 rovers | Observed |
| NASA, Surveyor and Apollo | 11 | 1966-1972 | Five Surveyors; six Apollo crews | Observed |
| CNSA, Chang'e | 4 | 2013-2024 | Two rovers; two sample returns | Observed |
| ISRO, Chandrayaan | 1 | 2023 | Chandrayaan-2 lander lost in 2019 | Observed |
| JAXA, SLIM | 1 | 2024 | Landed on its nose; still operated | Observed |
| Commercial, CLPS | 3 | 2024-2025 | IM-1, IM-2 and Blue Ghost Mission 1; both IM landers tipped | Observed |
Failed attempts left out of the totals: Beresheet (SpaceIL, 2019), Hakuto-R Mission 1 (ispace, 2023), Luna 25 (Roscosmos, 2023) and Resilience (ispace, 2025).
Who flies it next
Six Landers in Development, Two Crew Programs
The US Artemis landers and China's crewed program both use this corridor.
| Vehicle | Operator | Role | Rated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starship HLS | SpaceX | Crew lander for Artemis III; refilled in LEO | Building |
| Blue Moon MK1 | Blue Origin | Cargo lander | Building |
| Blue Moon MK2 | Blue Origin | Crew lander for Artemis V | Building |
| Lanyue and Mengzhou on Long March 10 | CMSA | Crewed landing before 2030 | Building |
| Chang'e-7 | CNSA | South-pole ice survey; launch postponed 24 August 2026 | Building |
| Chang'e-8 | CNSA | Resource-use demonstration ahead of ILRS | Building |
Program detail is on Artemis and Chinese Program Structure.
Gear ratio
Every Ton on the Surface Costs About 30.7 Tons Launched
Rocket equation for the full 5.90 km/s from LEO, dry mass fraction 0.10, times the 5.2× Earth-to-LEO launch factor.
| Propulsion | Isp | Mass ratio | Gear ratio | Rated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Storable, MMH/NTO | 320 s | 6.55 | 37.9× | Observed |
| Methane, LOX/CH4 | 360 s | 5.32 | 30.7× | Observed |
| Hydrogen, LOX/LH2 | 450 s | 3.81 | 22.0× | Observed |
| Nuclear thermal to lunar orbit, hydrogen to land | 900 s, 450 s | 2.42 | 14.0× | Modeled |
Landing needs high thrust, so nuclear electric propulsion can carry only the in-space legs. Water, oxygen and structure made on the Moon each replace that many tons of launch; whether making them beats shipping is the Ship-or-Make Threshold. The mass driver that sends material the other way is on The Moon.
Time and windows
Three Days, Any Day
The Moon is the only surface destination with a continuous launch window.
Apollo crews took about three days each way. Cargo can trade time for propellant on a ballistic lunar transfer: Korea's Danuri and NASA's CAPSTONE both took about four months in 2022 and saved on lunar orbit insertion.
Light time is 1.3 seconds each way, so surface machines can be teleoperated with lag - see Launch Windows & Cadence for the destinations where that stops being true.
China
Half the Landings Since 1976 Are Chinese
Four Chang'e landers, two relays and a crewed lander in development.
| Program | Data point | Rated |
|---|---|---|
| Chang'e-3 to Chang'e-6 · CNSA | Four landings, 2013-2024, on Long March 3B and Long March 5 | Observed |
| Queqiao-1 and Queqiao-2 · CNSA | Relays at EML-2 and in lunar frozen orbit; make far-side landings possible | Observed |
| Lanyue lander · CMSA | Crewed lander; Lanyue and Mengzhou launch separately on Long March 10 and dock in lunar orbit | Building |
| ILRS · CNSA and Roscosmos | South-pole base; nuclear power station delivery 2035 | Projected |
Contested
Deliberately Not Claimed
The load-bearing uncertainties, tagged with the confidence they actually earn.
The gear ratio ignores refilling. Starship HLS reaches the Moon after several tanker flights refill it in LEO. Refilling changes how many launches the corridor takes, not the mass ratio of the route.
One Δv for every landing site. Polar and equatorial sites cost nearly the same from LEO, but south-pole landings face long shadows and narrow lighting windows that the Δv does not show.
Record
Provenance and Data Sources
- Confidence
- Observed for flown, fielded or measured - Building for hardware and programs in development - Projected for announced plans - Modeled for original analysis
- Status date
- Q4 2026
- Mission data
- Apollo mission reports; Luna and Surveyor programs; CNSA Chang'e-3 to Chang'e-6; ISRO Chandrayaan-3; JAXA SLIM; Intuitive Machines IM-1 and IM-2; Firefly Blue Ghost Mission 1; KARI Danuri; NASA CAPSTONE
- China
- CNSA Chang'e and Queqiao; CMSA Mengzhou, Lanyue and Long March 10; Chang'e-7 postponement (24 August 2026)
- Weakest link
- Artemis lander schedules